↓ Skip to main content

Use of and Mortality After Bilateral Mastectomy Compared With Other Surgical Treatments for Breast Cancer in California, 1998-2011

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Use of and Mortality After Bilateral Mastectomy Compared With Other Surgical Treatments for Breast Cancer in California, 1998-2011
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.10707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison W. Kurian, Daphne Y. Lichtensztajn, Theresa H. M. Keegan, David O. Nelson, Christina A. Clarke, Scarlett L. Gomez

Abstract

Bilateral mastectomy is increasingly used to treat unilateral breast cancer. Because it may have medical and psychosocial complications, a better understanding of its use and outcomes is essential to optimizing cancer care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 781. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#25,038
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#582
of 36,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141
of 250,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.