↓ Skip to main content

Hypertensive Crises Challenges and Management

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
467 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypertensive Crises Challenges and Management
Published in
CHEST, June 2007
DOI 10.1378/chest.06-2490
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul E. Marik, Joseph Varon

Abstract

Hypertension affects > 65 million people in the United States and is one of the leading causes of death. One to two percent of patients with hypertension have acute elevations of BP that require urgent medical treatment. Depending on the degree of BP elevation and presence of end-organ damage, severe hypertension can be defined as either a hypertensive emergency or a hypertensive urgency. A hypertensive emergency is associated with acute end-organ damage and requires immediate treatment with a titratable short-acting IV antihypertensive agent. Severe hypertension without acute end-organ damage is referred to as a hypertensive urgency and is usually treated with oral antihypertensive agents. This article reviews definitions, current concepts, common misconceptions, and pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of patients with acutely elevated BP as well as special clinical situations in which BP must be controlled.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Brazil 7 1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 433 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 93 20%
Other 87 19%
Researcher 47 10%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Master 43 9%
Other 99 21%
Unknown 53 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 351 75%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 64 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,699,965
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#1,440
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,340
of 82,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#2
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.