↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Inhibitory effects of cacao bean husk extract on plaque formation in vitro and in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Oral Sciences, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Inhibitory effects of cacao bean husk extract on plaque formation in vitro and in vivo
Published in
European Journal of Oral Sciences, May 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00134.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiyo Matsumoto, Masato Tsuji, Jumpei Okuda, Hidekazu Sasaki, Kazuhiko Nakano, Kenji Osawa, Susumu Shimura, Takashi Ooshima

Abstract

Cacao bean husk extract (CBH) has been shown to possess antibacterial and antiglucosyltransferase activities through its unsaturated fatty acids and epicatechin polymers, respectively. In the present study, the antiplaque activities of CBH were examined in vitro and in vivo. The extract inhibited the adherence of Streptococcus mutans MT8148 to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite and reduced the accumulation of artificial dental plaque by S. mutans MT8148 on orthodontic wire. The number of mutans streptococci in dental plaque was also significantly reduced when human dental plaque was exposed to CBH from 21 children at 37 degrees C for 1 h. For the in vivo study, 28 volunteers aged 19-29 yr old rinsed their mouth with CBH, before and after each intake of food and before sleeping at night for 4 d without using other oral hygiene procedures. Plaque depositions and the numbers of mutans streptococci were reduced in the subjects, compared with rinsing with 1% ethanol alone. These results indicate that CBH possesses significant antiplaque activity in vitro and in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Engineering 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 36 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Oral Sciences
#589
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,858
of 62,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Oral Sciences
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.