↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Sexual selection targets cetacean pelvic bones

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 5,924)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
38 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Sexual selection targets cetacean pelvic bones
Published in
Evolution, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/evo.12516
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P. Dines, Erik Otárola‐Castillo, Peter Ralph, Jesse Alas, Timothy Daley, Andrew D. Smith, Matthew D. Dean

Abstract

Male genitalia evolve rapidly, probably as a result of sexual selection. Whether this pattern extends to the internal infrastructure that influences genital movements remains unknown. Cetaceans (whales and dolphins) offer a unique opportunity to test this hypothesis: since evolving from land-dwelling ancestors, they lost external hind limbs and evolved a highly reduced pelvis that seems to serve no other function except to anchor muscles that maneuver the penis. Here, we create a novel morphometric pipeline to analyze the size and shape evolution of pelvic bones from 130 individuals (29 species) in the context of inferred mating system. We present two main findings: (1) males from species with relatively intense sexual selection (inferred by relative testes size) tend to evolve larger penises and pelvic bones compared to their body length, and (2) pelvic bone shape has diverged more in species pairs that have diverged in inferred mating system. Neither pattern was observed in the anterior-most pair of vertebral ribs, which served as a negative control. This study provides evidence that sexual selection can affect internal anatomy that controls male genitalia. These important functions may explain why cetacean pelvic bones have not been lost through evolutionary time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Bachelor 25 21%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#163,286
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#21
of 5,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,433
of 273,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.