| Title |
Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Services Research, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth H. Bradley, Leslie A. Curry, Kelly J. Devers |
| Abstract |
To provide practical strategies for conducting and evaluating analyses of qualitative data applicable for health services researchers. DATA SOURCES AND DESIGN: We draw on extant qualitative methodological literature to describe practical approaches to qualitative data analysis. Approaches to data analysis vary by discipline and analytic tradition; however, we focus on qualitative data analysis that has as a goal the generation of taxonomy, themes, and theory germane to health services research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Philippines | 1 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 1% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| South Africa | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2359 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 441 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 432 | 17% |
| Researcher | 314 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 194 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 148 | 6% |
| Other | 487 | 20% |
| Unknown | 456 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 465 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 449 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 242 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 178 | 7% |
| Psychology | 132 | 5% |
| Other | 435 | 18% |
| Unknown | 571 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,589,502
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health Services Research
#366
of 2,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,651
of 176,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services Research
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.