↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

THE EVOLUTION OF STRESS‐INDUCED HYPERMUTATION IN ASEXUAL POPULATIONS

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
THE EVOLUTION OF STRESS‐INDUCED HYPERMUTATION IN ASEXUAL POPULATIONS
Published in
Evolution, February 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01576.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoav Ram, Lilach Hadany

Abstract

Numerous empirical studies show that stress of various kinds induces a state of hypermutation in bacteria via multiple mechanisms, but theoretical treatment of this intriguing phenomenon is lacking. We used deterministic and stochastic models to study the evolution of stress-induced hypermutation in infinite and finite-size populations of bacteria undergoing selection, mutation, and random genetic drift in constant environments and in changing ones. Our results suggest that if beneficial mutations occur, even rarely, then stress-induced hypermutation is advantageous for bacteria at both the individual and the population levels and that it is likely to evolve in populations of bacteria in a wide range of conditions because it is favored by selection. These results imply that mutations are not, as the current view holds, uniformly distributed in populations, but rather that mutations are more common in stressed individuals and populations. Because mutation is the raw material of evolution, these results have a profound impact on broad aspects of evolution and biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Belgium 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 107 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 31%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,580,631
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#445
of 5,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,281
of 168,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.