↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Length of Stay at Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility and Stroke Patient Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Rehabilitation nursing, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Length of Stay at Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility and Stroke Patient Outcomes
Published in
Rehabilitation nursing, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/rnj.218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Camicia, Hua Wang, Margaret DiVita, Jacqueline Mix, Paulette Niewczyk

Abstract

To examine the association of inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) length of stay (LOS) with stroke patient outcomes. A secondary data analysis of the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database. Stroke patients discharged from IRFs in the United States between 2009 and 2011 were identified and divided into mild (n = 639), moderate (n = 2,065), and severely (n = 2,077) impaired groups. Study outcomes included cognition and motor functional gains measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument and discharge to the community. The average LOS was 8.9, 13.9, and 22.2 days for mild, moderate, and severely impaired stroke patients, respectively. After controlling for FIM admission and other important covariates, a longer LOS was associated with a modest increase in cognition gain (β = 0.038, p = .0045) for the moderately impaired patients, and a modest increase in cognition (β = 0.13, p < .0001) and motor gains (β = 0.25, p < .0001) as well as a tendency for discharge to the community (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02) among the severely impaired patients. However, a longer LOS showed a negative association with functional gains among the mildly impaired patients as well as discharge to community for both mild and moderately impaired patients. The association of IRF LOS and patient outcomes varied by stroke impairment severity, positively for more severely impaired patients and negatively for mildly impaired patients. The study provides evidence for the care of stroke patients at the IRF setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Psychology 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,968,340
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Rehabilitation nursing
#77
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,694
of 281,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rehabilitation nursing
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them