↓ Skip to main content

Subjective and objective binge eating in relation to eating disorder symptomatology, negative affect, and personality dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Eating Disorders, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subjective and objective binge eating in relation to eating disorder symptomatology, negative affect, and personality dimensions
Published in
International Journal of Eating Disorders, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/eat.22066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M. Brownstone, Anna M. Bardone‐Cone, Ellen E. Fitzsimmons‐Craft, Katherine S. Printz, Daniel Le Grange, James E. Mitchell, Scott J. Crow, Carol B. Peterson, Ross D. Crosby, Marjorie H. Klein, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Thomas E. Joiner

Abstract

The current study explored the clinical meaningfulness of distinguishing subjective (SBE) from objective binge eating (OBE) among individuals with threshold/subthreshold bulimia nervosa (BN). We examined relations between OBEs and SBEs and eating disorder symptoms, negative affect, and personality dimensions using both a group comparison and a continuous approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 19%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,464,399
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#282
of 2,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,970
of 190,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.