↓ Skip to main content

Restrictive eating behaviors are a nonweight‐based marker of severity in anorexia nervosa

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Eating Disorders, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restrictive eating behaviors are a nonweight‐based marker of severity in anorexia nervosa
Published in
International Journal of Eating Disorders, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/eat.22163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle P. De Young, Jason M. Lavender, Kristine Steffen, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Scott G. Engel, James E. Mitchell, Scott J. Crow, Carol B. Peterson, Daniel Le Grange, Joseph Wonderlich, Ross D. Crosby

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the type and frequency of restrictive eating behaviors across the two subtypes of anorexia nervosa (AN; restricting [ANr] and binge eating/purging [ANbp]) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and to determine whether subtype differences in restrictive eating behaviors were attributable to severity of the disorder or the frequency of binge eating.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,106,816
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#735
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,864
of 202,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.