↓ Skip to main content

Do end of treatment assessments predict outcome at follow‐up in eating disorders?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Eating Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do end of treatment assessments predict outcome at follow‐up in eating disorders?
Published in
International Journal of Eating Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/eat.22175
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Lock, W. Stewart Agras, Daniel Le Grange, Jennifer Couturier, Debra Safer, Susan W. Bryson

Abstract

To examine the predictive value of end of treatment (EOT) outcomes for longer term recovery status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#1,403,100
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#266
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,924
of 201,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.