↓ Skip to main content

Greater anterior insula activation during anticipation of food images in women recovered from anorexia nervosa versus controls

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Greater anterior insula activation during anticipation of food images in women recovered from anorexia nervosa versus controls
Published in
Psychiatry Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.06.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyson Oberndorfer, Alan Simmons, Danyale McCurdy, Irina Strigo, Scott Matthews, Tony Yang, Zoe Irvine, Walter Kaye

Abstract

Individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) restrict food consumption and become severely emaciated. Eating food, even thinking of eating food, is often associated with heightened anxiety. However, food cue anticipation in AN is poorly understood. Fourteen women recovered from AN and 12 matched healthy control women performed an anticipation task viewing images of food and object images during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Comparing anticipation of food versus object images between control women and recovered AN groups showed significant interaction only in the right ventral anterior insula, with greater activation in recovered AN anticipating food images. These data support the hypothesis of a disconnect between anticipating and experiencing food stimuli in recovered AN. Insula activation positively correlated with pleasantness ratings of palatable foods in control women, while no such relationship existed in recovered AN, which is further evidence of altered interoceptive function. Finally, these findings raise the possibility that enhanced anterior insula anticipatory response to food cues in recovered AN could contribute to exaggerated sensitivity and anxiety related to food and eating.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Neuroscience 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research
#5,867
of 7,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,845
of 212,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research
#119
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.