↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic alliance in two treatments for adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Eating Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic alliance in two treatments for adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa
Published in
International Journal of Eating Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/eat.22187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen Stiles‐Shields, Stephen Touyz, Phillipa Hay, Hubert Lacey, Ross D. Crosby, Elizabeth Rieger, Bryony Bamford, Daniel Le Grange

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the strength and role of therapeutic alliance in a trial comparing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for anorexia nervosa (CBT-AN) and Specialist Supportive Clinical Management for the treatment of severe and enduring AN (SE-AN).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 22%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,000,155
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#2,497
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,163
of 202,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#37
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.