↓ Skip to main content

Developmental antecedents of abnormal eating attitudes and behaviors in adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Eating Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental antecedents of abnormal eating attitudes and behaviors in adolescence
Published in
International Journal of Eating Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/eat.22331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Le Grange, Meredith O'Connor, Elizabeth K. Hughes, Jacqui Macdonald, Keriann Little, Craig A. Olsson

Abstract

This study capitalizes on developmental data from an Australian population-based birth cohort to identify developmental markers of abnormal eating attitudes and behaviors in adolescence. The aims were twofold: (1) to develop a comprehensive path model identifying infant and childhood developmental correlates of Abnormal Eating Attitudes and Behaviors in adolescence, and (2) to explore potential gender differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 51 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 57 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,003,493
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#1,071
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,328
of 233,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#25
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.