↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study Examining Diagnostic Differences Among Exercise and Weight Suppression in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in European Eating Disorders Review, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Pilot Study Examining Diagnostic Differences Among Exercise and Weight Suppression in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder
Published in
European Eating Disorders Review, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/erv.2350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Cook, Kristine J. Steffen, James E. Mitchell, Maxwell Otto, Ross D. Crosby, Li Cao, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Scott Crow, Laura Hill, Daniel Le Grange, Pauline Powers

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate diagnostic differences in weight suppression (e.g., the difference between one's current body weight and highest non-pregnancy adult body weight) and exercise among Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED). Because exercise may be a key contributor to weight suppression in BN, we were interested in examining the potential moderating effect of exercise on weight suppression in BN or BED.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Psychology 11 20%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,541,630
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from European Eating Disorders Review
#371
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,827
of 263,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Eating Disorders Review
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.