↓ Skip to main content

DSM‐IV‐Defined Anorexia Nervosa Versus Subthreshold Anorexia Nervosa (EDNOS‐AN)

Overview of attention for article published in European Eating Disorders Review, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DSM‐IV‐Defined Anorexia Nervosa Versus Subthreshold Anorexia Nervosa (EDNOS‐AN)
Published in
European Eating Disorders Review, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/erv.2192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Le Grange, Ross D. Crosby, Scott G. Engel, Li Cao, Alfred Ndungu, Scott J. Crow, Carol B. Peterson, James E. Mitchell, Stephen A. Wonderlich

Abstract

Eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) is the most prevalent eating disorder, yet its heterogeneity begs less reliance on this broad diagnostic category. The purpose of this study was to compare women with anorexia nervosa (AN) and EDNOS, AN type (EDNOS-AN) from a multisite study on eating-related and general psychopathology measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,984,559
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from European Eating Disorders Review
#150
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,055
of 168,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Eating Disorders Review
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.