↓ Skip to main content

A rapid MCM‐41 dispersive micro‐solid phase extraction coupled with LC/MS/MS for quantification of ketoconazole and voriconazole in biological fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Chromatography, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rapid MCM‐41 dispersive micro‐solid phase extraction coupled with LC/MS/MS for quantification of ketoconazole and voriconazole in biological fluids
Published in
Biomedical Chromatography, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/bmc.3803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noorfatimah Yahaya, Mohd Marsin Sanagi, Noorizan Abd Aziz, Wan Aini Wan Ibrahim, Hadi Nur, Saw Hong Loh, Sazlinda Kamaruzaman

Abstract

A rapid dispersive micro-solid phase extraction (D-μ-SPE) combined with LC/MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of ketoconazole and voriconazole in human urine and plasma samples. Synthesized mesoporous silica MCM-41 was used as sorbent in D-μ-SPE of the azole compounds from biological fluids. Important D-μ-SPE parameters, namely type desorption solvent, extraction time, sample pH, salt addition, desorption time, amount of sorbent and sample volume were optimized. Liquid chromatographic separations were carried out on a Zorbax SB-C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 µm), using a mobile phase of acetonitrile - 0.05% formic acid in 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer (70:30, v/v). A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with positive ionization mode was used for the determination of target analytes. Under the optimized conditions, the calibration curves showed good linearity in the range of 0.1 - 10000 µg/L with satisfactory LODs (≤ 0.06 µg/L) and LOQ (≤ 0.3 µg/L). The proposed method also showed acceptable intra- and inter-day precisions for ketoconazole and voriconazole from urine and human plasma with RSD% ≤ 16.5% and good relative recoveries in the range of 84.3 - 114.8%. MCM-41-D-μ-SPE method proved to be rapid, simple and requires a small volume of organic solvent (200 μL) and thus advantageous for routine drug analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#19,995,718
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Chromatography
#975
of 2,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,205
of 350,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Chromatography
#21
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.