↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical Oxidation of Methionine Mediated by a Fullerene‐C60 Modified Gold Electrode

Overview of attention for article published in Electroanalysis, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrochemical Oxidation of Methionine Mediated by a Fullerene‐C60 Modified Gold Electrode
Published in
Electroanalysis, November 2008
DOI 10.1002/elan.200704335
Authors

W. T. Tan, J. K. Goh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Materials Science 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,221,807
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Electroanalysis
#223
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,700
of 97,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electroanalysis
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.