↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological characterisation of the antihyperglycaemic properties of Tinospora crispa extract

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnopharmacology, August 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological characterisation of the antihyperglycaemic properties of Tinospora crispa extract
Published in
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, August 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00008-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamdan Noor, Stephen J.H Ashcroft

Abstract

The efficacy of Tinospora crispa (Menispermaceae) extract for the treatment of diabetes has previously been verified in animal models. In order to substantiate the antidiabetic effect, we characterised the antihyperglycaemic properties by studying its effect on intestinal glucose absorption and glucose uptake into adipocytes. We also performed experiments to characterise in more detail the mechanism of T. crispa-evoked insulin release by challenging it with insulin secretory antagonists viz. adrenaline, somatostatin, verapamil and nifedipine. In addition, we also performed experiments to determine the effect of the extract on cAMP content. The results clearly showed that the antihyperglycaemic effect is not due to interference with intestinal glucose uptake or uptake of the sugar into the peripheral cells. Rather, the antihyperglycaemic effect of T. crispa is probably due to stimulation of insulin release via modulation of beta-cell Ca2+ concentration. That the insulinotropic effect of T. crispa is physiological suggests that the extract contains compounds which could be purified for use in the treatment of type II diabetes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Chemistry 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2008.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#2,270
of 7,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,921
of 31,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.