You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding and Assessing Governance Agents’ Relationships: The Contribution of Leader-Member Exchange Theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Procedia Economics and Finance, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01164-8 |
| Authors |
Mohammad Noor Hisham Osman, Hairul Suhaimi Nahar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,550,873
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Procedia Economics and Finance
#208
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,746
of 354,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Procedia Economics and Finance
#99
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.