You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A descriptive model and methods for up-scaled process routes for interfacial partition of bioparticles in aqueous two-phase systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biochemical Engineering Journal, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bej.2010.04.006 |
| Authors |
Frank Luechau, Tau Chuan Ling, Andrew Lyddiatt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 200% |
| India | 2 | 200% |
| Brazil | 2 | 200% |
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 1100% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 800% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 300% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 300% |
| Other | 2 | 200% |
| Other | 3 | 300% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 1300% |
| Engineering | 4 | 400% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 300% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 200% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 200% |
| Other | 7 | 700% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Engineering Journal
#256
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,927
of 103,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Engineering Journal
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.