↓ Skip to main content

Extinction risk assessment of the world’s seagrass species

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
569 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extinction risk assessment of the world’s seagrass species
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.010
Authors

Frederick T. Short, Beth Polidoro, Suzanne R. Livingstone, Kent E. Carpenter, Salomão Bandeira, Japar Sidik Bujang, Hilconida P. Calumpong, Tim J.B. Carruthers, Robert G. Coles, William C. Dennison, Paul L.A. Erftemeijer, Miguel D. Fortes, Aaren S. Freeman, T.G. Jagtap, Abu Hena M. Kamal, Gary A. Kendrick, W. Judson Kenworthy, Yayu A. La Nafie, Ichwan M. Nasution, Robert J. Orth, Anchana Prathep, Jonnell C. Sanciangco, Brigitta van Tussenbroek, Sheila G. Vergara, Michelle Waycott, Joseph C. Zieman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Philippines 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 1106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 204 18%
Student > Bachelor 182 16%
Researcher 173 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 156 14%
Other 43 4%
Other 157 14%
Unknown 228 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 369 32%
Environmental Science 327 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 63 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 3%
Engineering 19 2%
Other 56 5%
Unknown 275 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#782,805
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#667
of 6,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,953
of 127,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.