You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Kinetic and isotherm studies for lead adsorption from aqueous phase on carbon coated monolith
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical Engineering Journal, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.013 |
| Authors |
Yi Peng Teoh, Moonis Ali Khan, Thomas S.Y. Choong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Engineering Journal
#1,557
of 6,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,172
of 291,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Engineering Journal
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.