You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glioma-Derived miRNA-Containing Extracellular Vesicles Induce Angiogenesis by Reprogramming Brain Endothelial Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.073 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rocco Lucero, Valentina Zappulli, Alessandro Sammarco, Oscar D. Murillo, Pike See Cheah, Srimeenakshi Srinivasan, Eric Tai, David T. Ting, Zhiyun Wei, Matthew E. Roth, Louise C. Laurent, Anna M. Krichevsky, Xandra O. Breakefield, Aleksandar Milosavljevic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 17% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 57% |
| Scientists | 14 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,700,078
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#3,896
of 13,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,897
of 473,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#121
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.