↓ Skip to main content

ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tools Retrospective version (ICAST-R): Delphi study and field testing in seven countries

Overview of attention for article published in Child Abuse & Neglect, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tools Retrospective version (ICAST-R): Delphi study and field testing in seven countries
Published in
Child Abuse & Neglect, October 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P. Dunne, Adam J. Zolotor, Desmond K. Runyan, Inna Andreva-Miller, Wan Yuen Choo, Simon K. Dunne, Bernard Gerbaka, Oksana Isaeva, Dipty Jain, Mohd Sham Kasim, Bonnie Macfarlane, Nurgul Mamyrova, Clemencia Ramirez, Elena Volkova, Randa Youssef

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 23%
Social Sciences 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 49 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Child Abuse & Neglect
#1,246
of 3,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,253
of 107,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Abuse & Neglect
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.