↓ Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
743 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions
Published in
Ecosystem Services, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015
Authors

B. Pandeya, W. Buytaert, Z. Zulkafli, T. Karpouzoglou, F. Mao, D.M. Hannah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 743 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 738 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 140 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 19%
Researcher 130 17%
Student > Bachelor 52 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 5%
Other 104 14%
Unknown 139 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 271 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 46 6%
Social Sciences 37 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 5%
Other 84 11%
Unknown 183 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,459,565
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#483
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,362
of 423,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.