You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From present to future development pathways in fragile mountain landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Policy, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.016 |
| Authors |
Timos Karpouzoglou, Art Dewulf, Katya Perez, Praju Gurung, Santosh Regmi, Aiganysh Isaeva, Marc Foggin, Johan Bastiaensen, Gert Van Hecken, Zed Zulkafli, Feng Mao, Julian Clark, David M. Hannah, Prem Sagar Chapagain, Wouter Buytaert, Katarzyna Cieslik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,419,513
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Policy
#564
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,927
of 518,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Policy
#18
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.