↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of sardine based on biogenic amines using a fuzzy logic model

Overview of attention for article published in Food Chemistry, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the quality of sardine based on biogenic amines using a fuzzy logic model
Published in
Food Chemistry, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davood Zare, H.M. Ghazali

Abstract

There is an increasing concern about the quality and quality assessment procedures of seafood. In the present study, a model to assess fish quality based on biogenic amine contents using fuzzy logic model (FLM) is proposed. The fish used was sardine (Sardinella sp.) where the production of eight biogenic amines was monitored over fifteen days of storage at 0, 3 and 10°C. Based on the results, histamine, putrescine and cadaverine were selected as input variables and twelve quality grades were considered for quality of fish as output variables for the FLM. Input data were processed by rules established in the model and were then defuzzified according to defined output variables. Finally, the quality of fish was evaluated using the designed model and Pearson correlation between storage times with quality of fish showed r=0.97, 0.95 and 1 for fish stored at 0, 3 and 10°C, respectively.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Computer Science 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 17 45%