You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enzymatic hydrolysis of granular native and mildly heat-treated tapioca and sweet potato starches at sub-gelatinization temperature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Hydrocolloids, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.03.009 |
| Authors |
Y.N. Shariffa, A.A. Karim, A. Fazilah, I.S.M. Zaidul |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 27% |
| Engineering | 17 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Food Hydrocolloids
#220
of 1,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,133
of 108,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Hydrocolloids
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.