You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of institutions in finance curse: Evidence from international data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Economics, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jce.2017.04.001 |
| Authors |
Siong Hook Law, Ali M. Kutan, N.A.M. Naseem |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 56 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,449,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Economics
#256
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,197
of 344,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Economics
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.