↓ Skip to main content

In vitro antibacterial effects of Cinnamomum extracts on common bacteria found in wound infections with emphasis on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnopharmacology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro antibacterial effects of Cinnamomum extracts on common bacteria found in wound infections with emphasis on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Published in
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2014.02.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayuba Sunday Buru, Mallikarjuna Rao Pichika, Vasanthakumari Neela, Kavitha Mohandas

Abstract

Cinnamomum species have been widely used in many traditional systems of medicine around the world. In the Malaysian traditional system of medicine, the leaves, stem bark and stem wood of Cinnamomum iners, Cinnamomum porrectum, Cinnamomum altissimum and Cinnamomum impressicostatum have been used to treat wound infections. To study the antibacterial effects of Cinnamomum iners, Cinnamomum porrectum, Cinnamomum altissimum and Cinnamomum impressicostatum against common bacteria found in wound infections with primary focus on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 10%
Chemistry 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#4,888
of 7,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,728
of 235,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#51
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.