You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of particle size, fermentation and roasting of cocoa nibs on supercritical fluid extraction of cocoa butter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Food Engineering, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.008 |
| Authors |
E.K. Asep, S. Jinap, T.J. Tan, A.R. Russly, S. Harcharan, S.A.H. Nazimah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nicaragua | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 28% |
| Engineering | 26 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 25 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Engineering
#209
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,650
of 95,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Engineering
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.