You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of Mesua ferrea L. and Hura crepitans L. for shade creation and radiation modification in improving thermal comfort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.008 |
| Authors |
Mohd. F. Shahidan, Mustafa K.M. Shariff, Phillip Jones, Elias Salleh, Ahmad M. Abdullah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Algeria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 44 | 21% |
| Design | 26 | 12% |
| Engineering | 25 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,332,041
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#365
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,571
of 103,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.