You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of different fat replacers and drying methods on thermal behaviour, morphology and sensory attributes of reduced-fat coffee creamer
|
---|---|
Published in |
LWT - Food Science & Technology, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.05.008 |
Authors |
Simin Hedayatnia, Hamed Mirhosseini, Bahareh Tabatabaee Amid, Zaidul Islam Sarker, Sanja Kostadinović Veličkovska, Roselina Karim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 20% |
Engineering | 9 | 16% |
Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from LWT - Food Science & Technology
#685
of 2,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,747
of 333,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from LWT - Food Science & Technology
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.