↓ Skip to main content

Acute toxicity test of copper pyrithione on Javanese medaka and the behavioural stress symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute toxicity test of copper pyrithione on Javanese medaka and the behavioural stress symptoms
Published in
Marine Pollution Bulletin, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferdaus Mohamat-Yusuff, Ghafar Sarah-Nabila, Syaizwan Zahmir Zulkifli, Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai, Wan Norhamidah Wan Ibrahim, Shahrizad Yusof, Ahmad Ismail

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the median lethal concentration (LC50) of copper pyrithione (CuPT) at 96-hr exposure on adult Javanese medaka (Oryzias javanicus) in revealing toxicological effects of CuPT contamination in the tropical area. Wild stock fishes were acclimatized for 14-days prior analysis. Triplicate of test tanks for seven test concentrations were placed with ten fishes each, this includes two control tanks. The behaviour of the tested fishes was manually observed through a camera. The LC50 of CuPT at 96-h was found to be 16.58mg/L. Tested fishes swam slowly in vertical movement and swam fast towards food during feeding time as the sign of stress behaviour. Meanwhile, fishes in the two control groups swam actively in a horizontal manner and no excitement during feeding time. No mortality in control groups. Results indicate CuPT to be toxic to Javanese medaka at low concentration and caused behavioural stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#6,770
of 9,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,734
of 446,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#110
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.