You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomaterials used in stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Materials Science, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.002 |
| Authors |
Akon Higuchi, S. Suresh Kumar, Giovanni Benelli, Qing-Dong Ling, Hsing-Fen Li, Abdullah A. Alarfaj, Murugan A. Munusamy, Tzu-Cheng Sung, Yung Chang, Kadarkarai Murugan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Materials Science
#178
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,371
of 363,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Materials Science
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.