↓ Skip to main content

Highly potent stem cells from full-term amniotic fluid: A realistic perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 249)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Highly potent stem cells from full-term amniotic fluid: A realistic perspective
Published in
Reproductive Biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.repbio.2017.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adila A. Hamid, Muhammad Khair Joharry, Hoo Mun-Fun, Siti Nurusaadah Hamzah, Zulida Rejali, Mohd Nazri Yazid, Thilakavathy Karuppiah, Norshariza Nordin

Abstract

Amniotic fluid (AF) is now known to harbor highly potent stem cells, making it an excellent source for cell therapy. However, most of the stem cells isolated are from AF of mid-term pregnancies in which the collection procedure involves an invasive technique termed amniocentesis. This has limited the access in getting the fluid as the technique imposes certain level of risks to the mother as well as to the fetus. Alternatively, getting AF from full-term pregnancies or during deliveries would be a better resolution. Unfortunately, very few studies have isolated stem cells from AF at this stage of gestation, the fluid that is merely discarded. The question remains whether full-term AF harbors stem cells of similar potency as of the stem cells of mid-term AF. Here, we aim to review the prospect of having this type of stem cells by first looking at the origin and contents of AF particularly during different gestation period. We will then discuss the possibility that the AF, at full term, contains a population of highly potent stem cells. These stem cells are distinct from, and probably more potent than the AF mesenchymal stem cells (AF-MSCs) isolated from full-term AF. By comparing the studies on stem cells isolated from mid-term versus full-term AF from various species, we intend to address the prospect of having highly potent amniotic fluid stem cells from AF of full-term pregnancies in human and animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,962,193
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology
#26
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,490
of 323,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them