You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of Semiconductor Nanowires Using Optical Tweezers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nano Letters, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1021/nl200720m |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J. Reece, Wen Jun Toe, Fan Wang, Suriati Paiman, Qiang Gao, H. Hoe Tan, C. Jagadish |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 32 | 46% |
| Engineering | 10 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#6,016
of 12,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,526
of 110,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#70
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.