You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-application of a biosolids product and biochar to two coarse-textured pasture soils influenced microbial N cycling genes and potential for N leaching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-78843-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanjutha Shanmugam, Sasha N. Jenkins, Bede S. Mickan, Noraini Md Jaafar, Falko Mathes, Zakaria M. Solaiman, Lynette K. Abbott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#12,910,718
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#55,035
of 125,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,712
of 505,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,001
of 4,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.