You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of individual demographic and social factors on human–wildlife interactions: a comparative study of three macaque species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-78881-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krishna N. Balasubramaniam, Pascal R. Marty, Shelby Samartino, Alvaro Sobrino, Taniya Gill, Mohammed Ismail, Rajarshi Saha, Brianne A. Beisner, Stefano S. K. Kaburu, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Malgorzata E. Arlet, Nadine Ruppert, Ahmad Ismail, Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah, Lalit Mohan, Sandeep K. Rattan, Ullasa Kodandaramaiah, Brenda McCowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 20% |
| India | 4 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 22 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 17 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,545,940
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#14,722
of 140,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,032
of 522,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#540
of 4,460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.