You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhancing recovery of bioactive compounds from Cosmos caudatus leaves via ultrasonic extraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-96623-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Norliza Abdul Latiff, Pei Ying Ong, Siti Nor Azlina Abd Rashid, Luqman Chuah Abdullah, Nor Amaiza Mohd Amin, Noor Akhmazillah Mohd Fauzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,280,625
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#77,164
of 122,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,449
of 426,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,451
of 3,944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.