You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of Hypnosis: Toward the Development of a Biopsychosocial Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00207144.2014.961875 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark P. Jensen, Tomonori Adachi, Catarina Tomé-Pires, Jikwan Lee, Zubaidah Jamil Osman, Jordi Miró |
| Abstract |
Abstract Evidence supports the efficacy of hypnotic treatments, but there remain many unresolved questions regarding how hypnosis produces its beneficial effects. Most theoretical models focus more or less on biological, psychological, and social factors. This scoping review summarizes the empirical findings regarding the associations between specific factors in each of these domains and response to hypnosis. The findings indicate that (a) no single factor appears primary, (b) different factors may contribute more or less to outcomes in different subsets of individuals or for different conditions, and (c) comprehensive models of hypnosis that incorporate factors from all 3 domains may ultimately prove to be more useful than more restrictive models that focus on just 1 or a very few factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Romania | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 70 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 61 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#727,026
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
#12
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,906
of 269,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.