↓ Skip to main content

Development and application of dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent (dot-ELISA) assay for detection of Brucella melitensis and evaluation of the shedding pattern in infected goats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and application of dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent (dot-ELISA) assay for detection of Brucella melitensis and evaluation of the shedding pattern in infected goats
Published in
Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, August 2016
DOI 10.1080/15321819.2016.1220395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Opeyemi Mayowa Onilude, Sabri Mohd Yusoff, Benjamin Obukowho Emikpe, Polycarp Tanko, Salisi M. Shahrom, Mohammed Effendy

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of Brucella melitensis is essential for the treatment and control of brucellosis both in animals and humans. The thrust for the development of a rapid diagnostic technique to overcome the limitations of conventional microbiological and serological tests brought about this investigation on the development and application of dot-ELISA for antigen and antibody detection in infected goats. Fifteen apparently healthy Boer aged 2 - 3 years which tested negative for brucellosis using PCR and ELISA, were grouped into A (10 goats infected intraocularly with 10(7) CFU of B. melitensis) and B (5 goats) as control. Discharges (ocular, nasal and vaginal) and blood were collected at days 3, 7, 10, 14, weekly until 42 post-infection (pi) for dot-ELISA, PCR and RBPT. Dot-ELISA detected B. melitensis antigen and antibody in group A at day 3 and 7 pi respectively with adequate sensitivity and specificity relative to PCR and RBPT. The bacteria shedding detected from discharges at day 3 pi in the nasal and ocular route with dot-ELISA. Group B were consistently negative. Values such as speed, simplicity, field adaptability, high sensitivity and specificity make dot-ELISA a rapid and adequate technique for diagnosis of brucellosis in B.melitensis infected goats within few hours.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 35%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,210
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry
#178
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,923
of 366,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.