You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hydrothermally prepared graphene-titania nanocomposite for the solar photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Desalination & Water Treatment, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19443994.2015.1006816 |
| Authors |
Betty Yea Sze Chang, Muhammad Shahid Mehmood, Alagarsamy Pandikumar, Nay Ming Huang, Hong Ngee Lim, Rahman Marlinda, Norazriena Yusoff, Wee Siong Chiu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 24% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 18% |
| Engineering | 4 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,626,132
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Desalination & Water Treatment
#66
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,242
of 361,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Desalination & Water Treatment
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.