You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Photocatalytic degradation of cationic dye simulated wastewater using four radiation sources, UVA, UVB, UVC and solar lamp of identical power output
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Desalination & Water Treatment, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19443994.2015.1063463 |
| Authors |
Collin G. Joseph, Yun Hin Taufiq-Yap, Gianluca Li Puma, Kogularama Sanmugam, Kye Shane Quek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 23% |
| Engineering | 8 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,626,132
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Desalination & Water Treatment
#66
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,259
of 277,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Desalination & Water Treatment
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.