↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Oil Palm Root Penetration by Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformed Ganoderma boninense, Expressing Green Fluorescent Protein.

Overview of attention for article published in Phytopathology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of Oil Palm Root Penetration by Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformed Ganoderma boninense, Expressing Green Fluorescent Protein.
Published in
Phytopathology, February 2017
DOI 10.1094/phyto-02-16-0062-r
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nisha Govender, Mui-Yun Wong

Abstract

A highly efficient and reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol for Ganoderma boninense was developed to facilitate observation of the early stage infection of basal stem rot (BSR). The method was proven amenable to different explants (basidiospore, protoplast and mycelium) of G. boninense. The transformation efficiency was highest (62%) under a treatment combination of protoplast explants and Agrobacterium strain LBA 4404 with successful expression of hygromycin (hyg) marker gene and gus-gfp fusion gene, under the control of heterologous p416 gpd promoter. Optimal transformation conditions included 1:100 Agrobacterium to explant ratio, vir genes induction of the Agrobacterium in presence of 250 µm of acetosyringone, co-cultivation at 22 °C for 2 days on nitrocellulose membrane overlaid on an induction medium and regeneration of transformants on potato glucose agar prepared with 0.6 M sucrose and 20 mM phosphate buffer. Transformants evaluated were able to infect root tissues of oil palm plantlets with needle-like microhyphae during the penetration event. The availability of this model pathogen system for BSR may lead to a better understanding of the pathogenicity factors associated with G. boninense penetration into oil palm roots.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Phytopathology
#2,815
of 3,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,573
of 424,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytopathology
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.