You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Magnetic nanoparticles assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of chloramphenicol in water samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Royal Society Open Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsos.200143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Salwani Md Saad, Nur Afiqah Aling, Mazidatulakmam Miskam, Mardiana Saaid, Nur Nadhirah Mohamad Zain, Sazlinda Kamaruzaman, Muggundha Raoov, Nor Suhaila Mohamad Hanapi, Wan Nazihah Wan Ibrahim, Noorfatimah Yahaya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,075,400
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#3,020
of 4,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,191
of 373,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#116
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.