You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Taxonomy and Mapping of Computer-Based Critiquing Tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1109/tse.2013.32 |
| Authors |
Norhayati Mohd Ali, John Hosking, John Grundy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 31 | 66% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Design | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
#2,238
of 6,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,572
of 225,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.