You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of agricultural system, stand structural complexity and landscape context on foraging birds in oil palm landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ibis, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ibi.12025 |
| Authors |
Badrul Azhar, David B. Lindenmayer, Jeff Wood, Joern Fischer, Adrian Manning, Chris Mcelhinny, Mohamed Zakaria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 17% |
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,870,047
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#2,827
of 3,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,063
of 202,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.