↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics in allergy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics in allergy
Published in
Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1111/jpc.12175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Intan H Ismail, Paul V Licciardi, Mimi LK Tang

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of allergic disease has been linked to reduced microbial exposure in early life. Probiotics have recently been advocated for the prevention and treatment of allergic disease. This article summarises recent publications on probiotics in allergic disease, focusing on clinical studies of prevention or treatment of allergic disease. Studies employing the combined administration of pre-natal and post-natal probiotics suggest a role for certain probiotics (alone or with prebiotics) in the prevention of eczema in early childhood, with the pre-natal component of treatment appearing to be important for beneficial effects. On the other hand, current data are insufficient to support the use of probiotics for the treatment of established allergic disease, although recent studies have highlighted new hope in this area. Probiotic bacteria continue to represent the most promising intervention for primary prevention of allergic disease, and well-designed definitive intervention studies should now be a research priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Kazakhstan 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 22%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Other 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,077,903
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#1,115
of 3,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,063
of 212,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#15
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.