↓ Skip to main content

Novel calcium infusion regimen after parathyroidectomy for renal hyperparathyroidism

Overview of attention for article published in Nephrology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel calcium infusion regimen after parathyroidectomy for renal hyperparathyroidism
Published in
Nephrology, March 2017
DOI 10.1111/nep.12761
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jih Huei Tan, Henry Chor Lip Tan, Seng Cheong Loke, Sarojah A/P Arulanantham

Abstract

Calcium infusion is used after parathyroid surgery for renal hyperparathyroidism to treat post-operative hypocalcaemia. We compared a new infusion regimen to one commonly used in Malaysia based on 2003 K/DOQI guidelines. Retrospective data on serum calcium and infusion rates was collected from 2011-2015. The relationship between peak calcium efflux (PER) and time was determined using a scatterplot and linear regression. A comparison between regimens was made based on treatment efficacy (hypocalcaemia duration, total infusion amount and time) and calcium excursions (outside target range, peak and trough calcium) using bar charts and an unpaired T-test. 51 and 34 patients on the original and new regimens respectively were included. Mean PER was lower (2.16 vs 2.56 mmol/hr; p = 0.03) and occurred earlier (17.6 vs 23.2 hours; p = 0.13) for the new regimen. Both scatterplot and regression showed a large correlation between PER and time (R-square 0.64, SE 1.53, p < 0.001). The new regimen had shorter period of hypocalcaemia (28.9 vs 66.4 hours, p = 0.04), and required less calcium infusion (67.7 vs 127.2 mmol, p = 0.02) for a shorter duration (57.3 vs 102.9 hours, p = 0.001). Calcium excursions, peak and trough calcium were not significantly different between regimens. Early post-operative high excursions occurred when the infusion was started in spite of elevated peri-operative calcium levels. The new infusion regimen was superior to the original in that it required a shorter treatment period and resulted in less hypocalcaemia. We found that early aggressive calcium replacement is unnecessary and raises the risk of rebound hypercalcemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#21,938,746
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Nephrology
#866
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,117
of 315,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nephrology
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.